- Date of Release: 06 September 2024
- Genre: Drama, Romance
- Language: English
- Watch On: Amazon Prime Video
We Live In Time
Introduction
There are pertinent questions that I ask while watching many films, mostly based on whether certain creative choices were in fact needed in the narrative. And one such creative choice that I questioned was in the new English film We Live In Time which starred Andrew Garfield and Florence Pugh. In its opening act, there were a string of scenes put together wherein you are witness to the two characters of Almut (Florence Pugh) and Tobias (Andrew Garfield), being in the same frame together. So you see a pregnant Almut being taken care by Tobias in a scene, while the former also being conveyed to undergo therapy for a potentially terminal illness, to the couple mutually deciding on living life to the fullest in ‘happiness’ as opposed to ‘grief’. And while there were contrasting emotions in play, it never allowed me to fully invest in a single stream of thought. This non-linear narrative and the creative decision to back a project with this structure, is ultimately that made this drama terribly middling for me. One of the greatest use of a non-linear narrative lay in the Christopher Nolan directed film Memento, that saw the grand reveal of why the protagonist performed a certain action on a character at the start of the film. The issue for me in We Live In Time is that it doesn’t necessarily have a reveal at the end, and so it made less sense to deviate away from a conventional narrative that may have worked better, simply from a storytelling point of view. But alas, it wasn’t to be.
Story & Screenplay
The premise of We Live In Time wishes to focus on the different stages of grief that characters deal with over a period of time. And because you have the rider of time in the narrative, it hardly is a surprise that the makers opted for a non-linear narrative to reduce the fragments that accompany a time jump of sorts. But in the process, the editing further distances you from the proceedings and its characters. A simple placard of a year-stamp would have sufficed beginning with how the characters cross paths, to their relationship and the timely obstacles that they have to deal with. Instead, you are served decently staged sequences that hardly come together, emotionally speaking.
One of the highlights of the drama is the evolving relationship between Tobias and Almut with the third wheel being the presence of time. The latter is important given how it acts almost like a timer, or an expiry date for the relationship that essentially is showcased over a decade. So, this drama can also be viewed as a love triangle in its most abstract form, wherein you are privy to Tobias meeting Almut by a searing play of fate, particularly having exited a toxic relationship of his own. Almut too is seen being focused on her career as a chef, until the bug of love seems to have smitten here. And thus begins, a very intimate affair of sorts wherein you see the couple grow, from their personal preferences to the actual ones that matter, that eventually shapes up their relationship. One of the interesting plot-points as far as Almut was concerned was, her rigid thought of not getting married to Tobias that results in a blunt set of words that transpire. Ironically, when she actually agrees, fate has other plans for her, which essentially means that the third wheel of time has a part to play in ‘probably’ having a final say in the relationship between Tobias and Almut.
That said, it cannot be denying that I was barely invested in the drama that largely depended on the emotions for it to work in its entirety. And the structure played a huge part in the disservice that the drama had to offer. It hardly moved me because the time lines were jumped from the past to the present and later to the future, something that never saw me invest in any character. There were a few heartfelt moments which individually worked like Almut giving birth to her baby at a gas station on new year’s eve, only for the new year to stage a new chapter in the lives of the characters. Or even, Tobias and his daughter waving a final goodbye to Almut on an ice-skating court. But these moments are few and far between – instead, the drama gets unnecessarily convoluted in the middle that actually made me decipher on which period in the life of the couple is the scene representing. This was not ideal given that the drama needed to be razor sharp with the intent of making you fall in love with the characters while presenting an emotional core that would make you weep! Hence, it can’t be denied that the editing was a mess that flirted with the writing to a point of no return, despite some solid performances that nearly save the day.
Dialogues, Music & Direction
The dialogues are conversational but the impact of the lines in terms of the emotions in store was severely impacted by the structure of the narrative. The BGM is decent but it doesn’t quite do enough to raise the bar of emotions in a particular theme. I remember the film Aashiqui 2 and that haunting melody that beautifully held the narrative while allowing you space to invest in the characters – yes, no such luck here. The cinematography comprises of frames that feature tight to mid-shots that beautifully represent the intimacy between characters, particularly with respect to their relationship. If you were to reimagine the drama in a chronological form, you see how the frames are wide to begin with between characters while slowly moving into their intimate space, only to later widen the gap between the two characters, almost to let go of their respective fates. The same would have been understood even better if the structure of the film was linear, which means the editing solely remains the biggest culprit of the film. Director John Crowley manages to do a decent job here, mainly with the setting wherein he allows the chemistry between his two characters to essentially drive the narrative. It is a pity that the structure did not do justice to his narrative style, because a few sequences did feel heartfelt even when viewed individually. But largely, the direction remains mid due to the non-linear structure.
Performances
This is essentially a two character film and the performances of the leads nearly save the day. Florence Pugh as Almut is a fiery combination of fire and ice, both of which are explored at different instances in her life. She is natural to the core while being assertive as well as when she is vulnerable and needing support, and she is wonderful to witness here. Andrew Garfield as Tobias is the perfect foil for Almut with his calming demeanor that makes his character supremely affable. There are traces of angst with his character but at its core, he is the glue of their relationship that holds the two of them together through all the obstacles that life has to offer. The duo share some crackling chemistry between the two, that is partially diluted by its structure, something which is a shame of sorts.
Conclusion
We Live In Time is a middling Rom-Com ‘nearly’ saved by solid performances. Despite its emotional theme, I was hardly moved due to its non-linear narrative that had no business to be a part of this film. I just wonder if the impact would have been better, had the drama followed a linear chronological trajectory……Oh how I wish….