Kapkapiii
Introduction
Imagine this – you go to a restaurant wanting to feast on one of most favourite delicacies. Your expectation is that your dish will be freshly cooked and served piping hot, only for the dish to arrive lukewarm and stale. That is the primary reason that Bollywood is suffering from today – it isn’t even an identity crisis alone when it is repeatedly making the same bl**dy mistake every single time. At this point, it is honestly frustrating to be a Bollywood fanboy given how I have literally grown up on watching Hindi films (and the South Indian films came into my life much later). In times of OTT, how do you actually go on to greenlit projects that are firstly remakes, and secondly, the original film has a hindi-dubbed version tagged to it already! So you can understand my frustration as I unwillingly ventured into watching the new Hindi film Kapkapii which is the official remake of the Malayalam film Romancham (2023). And imagine the audacity to remake something that many people have already watched and enjoyed, while serving the same dish with a different garnish and a degrading taste for you to enjoy! Bravo Bollywood!
Story & Screenplay
An official remake (and I won’t dignify it by using the much abused term ‘adaptation’) of the Malayalam film Romancham, Kapkapii is essentially a story of six boys that start observing peculiar activities in their house while messing with an ouija board that potentially unleashes an evil spirit. Right from the first frame, I knew that the drama here was in trouble. Remember the cozy conversations that brew between the character of Soubin Shahir and the nurse in the original? The same sequence while copy-pasted just feels stale and lacks the soul with respect to its staging. The staging is further degraded in its extended flashback sequence when all the characters are introduced turn by turn.
The beauty of Romancham lay in its detailing – the drama itself felt rooted from the bylanes of Bangalore where madness would ensue. The house itself felt like a place reserved for the bachelors given how tiny it was and the chemistry between the boys was the main highlight of the drama to begin with. In that regard, Kapkapii is a scene by scene anti-thesis of sorts that tries to add a few ingredients of its own in the narrative that don’t add any distinct flavours at all. Firstly, the setting is that of Faridabad (and not Bangalore) that just didn’t give the vibe of the city. Secondly, the house looked a little more polished and spacious, only for it to appear to look like a bachelor’s house (logistics remain a big issue for films in Bollywood that compromises on the soul of the film). And lastly, the chemistry between the boys felt just so staged that the energy didn’t seem to flow in an organic manner. But as an addition, you are also introduced to two female characters that fail to add a unique texture in the drama.
The basic beats of Kapkapii remain similar to Romancham, but what the film lacks is its unhinged source of eccentricity that essentially drove the narrative in the original. Because there are female characters too (and this isn’t a gender debate folks), the natural inclination of the writing remained to incorporate additional tracks in the narrative that only slowed the proceedings further. In a scene, you are witness to a character talking to a girl that he hasn’t ever met, on the phone while the joke remains on how the girl is one of the female characters who lives right above his roof. But by doing this, you directly compromised on the setting wherein the spacious house doesn’t give out the same vibes.
You remember the wedding sequence at the start in Romancham and how the boys are just grooving to the beats while exiting the location? The Bollywood-ized version of it incorporates an item number out of nowhere, just to cater to the lowest common denominator as far as the viewers are concerned. And notice how Romancham had an underlying commentary on the lack of jobs amongst the characters that actually was a trigger point for the rest of the drama to unfold? That commentary is severely diluted here, focusing more on the comedy of jest in attempting a game of ‘ouija’ as opposed to actually making the unemployment a driving force in the narrative. The gags by the way, are unfunny and forced as well while the humour just doesn’t land. Hell, even the sequence involving Dibyendu Chattacharya’s don character was so unfunny and odd in terms of its staging, that it could never match the madness of Chemban Vinod Jose from the original.
One main feature of Romancham remained the ambiguity of the spirit that was balanced out by various factors in the narrative (like the present of rats for an instance). But because the focus here was to spoon-feed the viewers, the makers decided to lay everything on the table by randomly stuffing the narrative with multiple jump-cuts in the middle of a scene, only to leave the viewers dazed and confused at what was being served to them. This also includes a headache prone extended sequence featuring a new character Kabir (Tusshar Kapoor) that didn’t really dwell upon his trauma while being extremely repetitive in its presentation. All of this, while I patiently awaited the film to end, quietly sitting through one sequence after another until the finale that tested my patience to no bounds. It weirdly was neither a horror that worked on its atmospherics, and nor was it a comedy wherein my facial muscles refused to flinch even once. The screenplay here invented a new genre called a headache-comedy that had its effects on me, long after the film had ended!
Dialogues, Music & Direction
The dialogues here are extremely forced and headache-inducing with lines that are not only unfunny but irritating too. Lines like ‘Woh Sant Kabir Nahi, Kabir Singh Hai’ (He isn’t Saint Kabir but Kabir Singh) or ‘I Can Lift You’ are the worst kind of wordplays that one can ever indulge in. Also, do you remember the immaculately brilliant soundtrack and BGM by Sushin Shyam in Romancham that contributed to the chaos and eccentricity in the film? Here, all you witness are mid-tracks with uninspirational BGM wherein the music director seemingly did not understand the assignment in hand at all. What that did was further flatten out the drama and push it towards an uneventful outing. The cinematography fails to replicate the claustrophobic setting of the original which also was the root cause for the ambience of horror in the narrative. Here, the frames are flattened out to such a large extent that let alone the ambience, even the city of Faridabad didn’t feel like home for this film. The editing is outrageous, reducing the drama to a combination of multiple reels. It further didn’t help that there were multiple jump cuts to spoon-feed its viewers, that further complicated the narrative while reducing its impact. Director Sangeeth Sivan in his final outing on celluloid (he passed away in May 2024) misses the mark here. I don’t wish to be overtly critical about the direction, as a mark of respect for the passed soul, but the direction wasn’t the best and did not create a raw and mad impact that was in fact the need of the hour.
Performances
The performances remain a mixed bag here. Dibyendu Bhattacharya as Jamil didn’t quite match up to the innocent eccentricity of Chemban Vinod Jose from the original. Varun Pandey as Nirup and Dherendra Tiwari as Vijay are just about ok but nothing much to shout about. Jay Thakkar as Nanku has his moments to shine. Sonia Rathee as Madhu does a decent job but her character came across as such a confused character that I wasn’t sure on what she stood for. Siddhi Idnani as Kavya is sincere and earnest. Abhishek Kumar as Rivin shines and manages to leave a good impression in the film. Dinkar Sharma as Achyuth is decent but never fully utilized in the script. The casting director must be held up for handpicking Tusshar Kapoor of all people to portray the role of the brilliant Arjun Ashokan in the original. And as Kabir, Tusshar is badly exposed with his limited acting range and his failure to captivate the audience in a second half that did rest on his shoulders. His performance was so poor and irritating that I was woefully distracted, and just didn’t care after a point about his ‘trauma’. Shreyas Talpade as Manu does a decent job but at times, he gave me an impression that he was trying too hard to make you smile. His comedic portions felt forced which never is a good sign. But overall, he was one of the better actors on display.
Conclusion
Kapkapiii is a stalely reheated remake of the original Malayalam film Romancham that invents a new genre of its own – a Headache-Comedy! And the film represents everything that is wrong with Bollywood and Hindi films at the moment, which has really made me sad, worried and quite honestly frustrated. Available in a theatre near you.