Popcorn Reviewss

White thumbnail popcorn reviewss
popcorn reviewss banner
White thumbnail popcorn reviewss

Havoc

Farhad Dalal Founder
By-
Farhad Dalal
Rating
3 Star popcorn reviewss

Introduction

Picture this – a man walking in a hospital with an automatic machine gun, aiming at a patient lying lifeless on his hospital bed and taking infinite shots at pumping pieces of lead into the body, even as the bloodied body remains wasted and splashed in a pool of blood. If this remains your cup of tea, the new English film Havoc would immensely appeal to you. Afterall, the film does boast of some god-level violence and gore which is directly in line with Director Gareth Evans’ previous films like The Raid (2011) and The Raid 2 (2014). But having said that, if you are in for the story or the writing, all you would get is a slender thread that is so generic that it doesn’t necessarily have enough meat to boast of. And this kind of makes Havoc a tricky film to review – do you wish to choose style over substance? The answer is somewhere in between while being tempted to say yes. I have always maintained that R-rated Action films need to have slender storylines while actually focusing on the action that was promised to its viewers. But the one ingredient that Havoc misses out on, is the emotional core or the emotional arc of the characters. This is particularly true for its protagonist Walker (Tom Hardy) who has an estranged family that often makes him mumble away at his workplace, but I couldn’t quite help but think that his stakes in the drama remained restricted.

Story & Screenplay

The story is simple – the onus lies on Walker, on the payroll of a real-estate Tycoon Lawrence (Forest Whitaker), to rescue Lawrence’s son Charlie (Justin Cornwell) and his partner-in-crime Mia (Quelin Sepulveda) from a local triad headed by “Mother” (Yeo Yann Yann) who in turn would go to any length in avenging the death of her son during a shootout. Essentially, the writing tries to add complexity in the plot through its blind character introductions without providing context of the proceedings, but if I were to sit and analyze – the writing was pretty much all of this. And instantly, a basic characterization issue was linked to Walker who was shown to be a depressed cop, but this trait didn’t necessarily add up to the main plot. I mean even if he was showcased to be a badass cop (which is also partly shown), the story would still have stayed the same. The little backstory of Walker and his family was less convincing, and had very little impact on the proceedings.

There is a steady buildup with respect to its characters that is spread between a high-octane chase sequence at the start, that literally sets the tone for the drama to follow. What that does is allow the viewers a sneak peak into the future (of the film), on the road that lies ahead. The motivations of a few characters are concealed while superseding the shock factor with respect to the gore more than focusing on the identities or the emotional core. And that isn’t always a bad thing. The emotions are generally binary and broad-stroked, something that is communicated through the characters too. For instance, in a scene you see the character of “Mother” entering the fray and randomly shooting down three extras before inquiring about her son’s death with Ching (Sunny Pang). The core emotion is that of anger coupled with a quest for revenge.

The initial buildup later makes way for some remarkable action set-pieces on offer. This incidently also coincides with the motivations of characters getting clearer by the minute, while also teasing the viewers about the identity of the actual culprits. Keeping that in mind, the nightclub massacre sequence has got to be one of the highlights of the film. The stage is set with all stakeholders landing up at a single location that results in a mass brawl. The ‘extras’ are pumped with multiple rounds of lead, limbs and body parts are chopped off, and blood and gore finally find their voices in a major way in that sequence. I liked how the rhythm of the scene began to increase its pacing after every minute, and so did the intensity that resulted in complete mayhem. Perhaps, one way of hiding the identity of the ‘extras’ was to use marks like in the Hindi film Animal (2023), but the sequence still makes a splash.

A similar sequence plays out in the final act as well, with bodies being pumped with bullets and blood richocheting on the face even while the adrenaline levels remain high. The final act is essentially divided into two parts – with mayhem spaced between a meeting between all stakeholders. In the first half, extras are bloodied, killed, smashed, abused and sent straight to hell. And in the second half, more of the same transpires although my general consensus remained on how contrieved the events were, something that could have been fleshed out. But largely, the action set-piece was straight out of a video-game on easy mode – and who was even complaining. The interesting bit remained the intertwining dynamics between Lawrence and “Mother” – two very similar characters that faced similar issues with respect to their child who had been neglecting them (until one died), and largely both characters met with a similar fate as well. For me, this remained a lone spark from the emotional core of the film that otherwise was devoid of any emotions. And that for me summed up the screenplay too that had tremendous action but very little of everything else after a point. Still, the action ensures that the film is fun and largely watchable.

Dialogues, Music & Direction

The dialogues are specifically designed to be fillers, and nothing much to write home about with respect to the emotions. It is an action flick and action is what is served. The BGM is superb while expertly complimenting the action set-pieces that literally act as pillars of strength for the drama. The cinematography is excellent with frames literally keeping pace with the action sequences during their full flow. Rarely do we witness the camera moving in sync with the action that is underway, and this definitely heightens the impact of the film, overall. The editing is crisp and sharp with some wonderful fast cuts incorporated during the action set-pieces. The switching of POVs from one character to another can be tricky task but the editing allows the action to land perfectly. The CGI with respect to the gore and violence is top-notch, and some that also contributes well to the overall impact of the film. Director Gareth Evans has a flair for action that is always presented in a stylized manner. It is designed to be bloody and gory, a trait that remains consistent with this film as well. In other words, he scores in a major way with the action. But at the same time, I did feel that there was a sense of reluctance in even shifting attention towards the emotional core of the film. If the story is simplistic, emotions become key contributors to an action entertainer. And that was lacking – the action was great but had the emotions been deeper, the impact would have been way higher.

Performances

The performances are good by the members of the cast. Michelle Waterson-Gomez as the Assassin is outstanding in her combat sequences and she plays a major role in elevating the action set-pieces. Timothy Olyphant as Vincent is pretty smooth and stylish as the nemesis for the protagonist (and his other stakeholders), and he does a good job here. Sunny Pang as Ching is menacing in an understated manner and he manages to leave a mark too. Forest Whitaker as Lawrence is decent but his character is still a shade underwritten. Yeo Yann Yann as “Mother” is stoic with her expressions that automatically classifies as her being intimidating. There is a cold presence that she commands, and works perfectly well with her character. Justin Cornwell as Charlie and Quelin Sepulveda as Mia are wonderful actors who also score heavily in combat sequences. There is a synergy and intensity that both bring to the table, that automatically translates beyond the fourth wall. Jessie Mei Li as Ellie has a solid screen presence and does a sincere and an earnest job. Tom Hardy as Walker is a clear example of how an actor can rise above the written material and make a splash. Here, his characterization was shallow but Tom brings such intensity and agility to his character that it is hard not to enjoy his presence onscreen. He is good in dramatic moments but phenomenal in his action set-pieces thereby summing up a solid outing for him.

Conclusion

Havoc is a routine thriller significantly elevated by god-level action set-pieces, violence and g*re that ensures that it is a fun watch. Yes, the writing is surface level and doesn’t boast of a strong emotional core. But it is the action that makes this film pretty enjoyable. Hence, action junkies can assemble and everyone else can disperse! Available on Netflix.

Latest Posts

error: Content is protected !!