Popcorn Reviewss

White thumbnail popcorn reviewss
popcorn reviewss banner
White thumbnail popcorn reviewss

Materialists

Farhad Dalal Founder
By-
Farhad Dalal
Rating
4 Star popcorn reviewss

Introduction

The opening sequence featuring a cave-man proposing to his better half by gifting her a ring-shaped flower is enough to symbolize the title of the new English film Materialists. The theme directly extends itself to the urban setting even when you are introduced to Lucy (Dakota Johnson), essaying the role of a matchmaker in the deeply chaotic and diverse city of New York that is host to different kinds of characters. And with diverse characters come diverse choices, something that often is a frivolous occupational hazard for Lucy. If Lucy was a hairstylist, the demands of customizing a haircut for her clients wouldn’t change either. But in the dating game, the list of requirements would only keep getting overwhelming. And in all of it, the title of the film continues to act as a searing theme of love – a sentiment that is extended to the looks, finances, ethnicity and personality of a person, without actually having love on the table. In a scene, this frivolous requirement of love is actually explained by Lucy while taking about her client Sophie (Zoe Winters). She states that Sophie is a middle-aged okay looking with an okay personality and okay finances, and that not one quality stands out (in reference to why Sophie isn’t setup for a date with anyone). In the same breath, she also states ‘how men undergoing surgeries for heights by breaking their leg bones may actually be an investment’, thereby signalling her frivolous trait!

Story & Screenplay

In the heart of hearts, Materialists is a love triangle between three good-looking people (and if you do agree with the latter part of this statement, congratulations my friend, you are a materialist too). But should you choose to look closely while bending the angles of this triangle, you will notice that this is exactly the same plot of Celine Song’s immaculate debut Past Lives (2023), where the sombre tragic tone is directly replaced with a frivolous yet profound outlook on the concept of love. And yet again, it is the characters that standout. If Materialists was an Indian reality show on Netflix, it would have been called ‘Indian Matchmaking’, and Lucy would have been our beloved ‘Seema Aunty’ (though she isn’t an ‘aunty’ by any stretch of imagination here). In a scene, you see Lucy mouthing similar dialogues of compromise while taking about the outward state of her client corresponding to the demands that are put on the table.

Being in a frivolous business of matchmaking, you notice that Lucy has successfully imbibed this trait. On second thoughts, probably she always had this frivolous trait in her, of wanting a rich man, with rich looks who would potentially save her from her own set of debts. In a scene, you see Lucy literally calling out her then boyfriend John (Chris Evans) about his financial conditions, in a complete case of public humiliation. This, while John is left dumbfounded. In a different world, I can totally imagine John to be a struggling actor from Aram Nagar, fighting to make his ends meet in a cruel neighbourhood like Versova, in a big bad city like New York. You see his passion for acting that has made him compromise with his finances – he takes up odd jobs to make ends meet while being put up in a tiny apartment whom he shares with fellow strugglers in the city of New York.

The third wheel of this love story is Harry (Pedro Pascal), a privileged businessman, 6 feet tall and good-looking man who would ideally raise the bar for any girl looking for potential matches. In a scene, you see Lucy telling him on how he was “perfect” and that any girl would die to be with him, although she remained confused about her own intentions, admittedly being her love for money, or her love for the guy with money. Hence, there is an understated commentary on classism that is maintained through its characters even during the most frivolous passages in the film. And honestly, the humour just springs up through some rather hilarious sequences that would make you smile and chuckle in the first hour.

There is a definite tonal change in the drama at the halfway mark when the proceedings transition from being frivolous to something that remains a little more profound. And it all kickstarts from a tragedy that triggers a chain of thoughts for Lucy, and the choices that she chooses to make from that point. There is a sense of reality check on the part of Lucy, who is visibly shaken up by the incident, making her question the very concept of love and dating in the first place. In a scene with John, you see her baring her soul on why individuals wish to marry given that love will fizzle out after a point, both in the form of intimacy and separation, leading to fights and long standoffs about the possession of kids. She even changes her stance with Harry, stating that dating for marriage is a two-way business deal ONLY if love is on the table.

Interestingly, you also notice a sense of vulnerability on the part of the men of this universe – a visibly shaken Harry admits that he chose to go under the knife given how he wasn’t popular with the women. John is also vulnerable with his finances that pretty much stays consistent with his initial personality. In a way, all three individuals are tied up with materialistic notions of the society, while turning a blind idea to the pure and unadulterated concept of love. This, even as the drama ends with a sense of hope with respect to the realisation of the three characters.

In many ways, the drama here can be viewed as a (late) coming-of-age tale particularly for Lucy, or more specifically her metamorphosis in the game of love, hinting at also quitting the one agency that is a symbol of materialism – her dating company! And you also notice a visible shift in the warmth of the characters towards each other, from being frivolous and non-committal to actually transitioning into a territory of romance that is heartwarming. And the contrasting nature of the screenplay highlights exactly that. Damn, this felt like a Bollywood movie from the early 2000s when life was simple and the OTTs, Social Media and the Corporates hadn’t corrupted cinema. The screenplay here was fun and frolik with heavy bouts of some heartfelt romance along the way.

On a side note, I did not expect to witness a love triangle between Madame Web (of Bandra), Captain America (of Aram Nagar, Versova) and Mister Fantastic (of South Bombay) ever. And ofcourse, you could easily switch the places as per your geographical locations, or ethnicities (given how all of us are materialists😂).

Dialogues, Music & Direction

There is a palatable undertone of sass and leisure with subtle bouts of humour that graces the dialogues in the film. And all of it, often leads to a bucket of amusement when you see the interactions brewing, mostly that are frivolous and something that goes superbly with the theme of the drama. Even when the dialogues choose to be poignant, the proceedings never get preachy or heavy, maintaining a wonderful posture of a breezy Rom-Com through and through. The music is peppy and it perfectly compliments the urban setting. The BGM accentuates the emotions that are brimming beneath the surface while also accounting for the playful flirtatious vibes that are exchanged between the leads. The cinematography exercizes a sense of vibrancy in terms of its setting, that does allow the city of New York to be the center of classism, even while acknowledging the diversity that it brings to the table through the people that reside in it. The idea of an urban Rom-Com is perfectly well complimented through its frames.

The editing is razor sharp while keeping the length of the drama in check while maintaining a seabed of emotions that holds the drama together. Director Celine Song just loves her triangles (and her ‘mathematics’ of love). Just like in Past Lives, she explores the complexities of finding true love in a big urban city that is essentially diverse to even the needs of individuals. Yet, the mood isn’t sombre and pondering as her first feature film, often indulging in a bit of sass and playfulness in a contrasting set of events that are frivolous and poignant. Even her characters speak her language of love beautifully, seamlessly adapting to the environment and situations around them, while making for a wonderful watch. And hence, the director succeeds in bringing these elements wonderfully together thereby making for a brilliant watch. Also, the feminist gaze reflects beautifully on the sensibilities of the director here.

Performances

The performances are exceptional by the members of the cast. Zoe Winters as Sophie is the standout actor amongst the supporting cast, wherein she perfectly explores her vulnerable streak with respect to her character. And her character arc, makes you want to empathize with her. Pedro Pascal as Harry looks debonair and rich (both literally and figuratively), while having an understated approach to his character. There is a palpable sense of vulnerability that he hides behind a shield of stature, and the former is something that makes him so real. Chris Evans as John (how is he even poor, lol) also puts forth a commendable act of a character who is willing to commit to love despite the difficulties with his finances. For him, love remains the most important thing, something that actively sets him apart from all characters, and his sense of sincerity and eartnestness drives this virtue. Dakota Johnson as Lucy has a certain rhythm to her character with the way she talks to people around her. The cold tone that laces her character is symbolic of her materialistic habits, without wanting to commit to the idea of true love. Hence, her metamorphosis is directly correlated to her character arc wherein you witness the shift in her tonality of voice that tilts towards being heartwarming. There are a variety of emotions that she caters to, and she uses her body language and expressions beautifully to express her multiple character traits. She was brilliant and a treat to witness here.

Conclusion

Materialists features Celine Song’s fetish for love triangles once again in this biting take on the complexities of love and dating, that makes for a brilliantly humourous and poignant watch. Available in a theatre near you and Highly Recommended.

Latest Posts

error: Content is protected !!