Black Bag
Introduction
In a scene in the English film Black Bag, you see the character of George (Michael Fassbender) fishing in a pond. This is symbolic of his search of a traitor in his department, almost in the form of ‘fishing’ for clues that laces the narrative. In the same scene, you also have a character ‘feeding’ George information about Kathryn (Cate Blanchett), his wife and colleague about her whereabouts in Europe. Almost instantly, that scene opens up on two themes of the drama – a mole in the department discreetly leaking out information and betraying the nation, and a rocky marriage that George is a part of. Yet, Black Bag, its title symbolic of a secret information of sorts isn’t an espionage thriller on the lines of Mission Impossible or James Bond (oddly, it does star Former James Bond Pierce Brosnan as one of its characters too). In fact, it is more on the lines of Bridge Of Spies (2015) wherein most of the drama showcased is ‘outside’ the fire zone. And so, automatically the writing opens up for several infused moments of dry humour that adds texture to the narrative.
Story & Screenplay
The mission of George in Black Bag is simple – find the traitor who is secretly leaking information to the rival stakeholders, and prevent a catastrophe from taking place. And his prime suspects include a satellite imagery specialist Clarissa (Marisa Abela), and her boyfriend Freddie (Tom Burke), the agency psychiatrist Zoe (Naomie Harris) and her boyfriend James (Rege-Jean Page), and the most important of them all, George’s wife Kathryn. And given the inter-personal relationships at play, the entire first act unfolds like an episode from Perfect Strangers (2016). The setting is moderately tense with a playful undertone that is laced with dry humour, which often erupts during the ‘dinner’ conversations that transpire between the folks. The revelations over an unassuming game too aren’t result oriented for George, but more on the lines of infidelity that you would associate to be the oddly sprayed ingredient in an espionage thriller. But that is what sets this thriller aside without firing any shots (initially), and still providing room for humour to set in.
One of the interesting aspects of the characterization are that almost all suspects are coated with the same paint. This basically means that there is a rhythmic routine to every character in the same setting, that doesn’t quite allow you room to place your bets on anyone. The room for dropping hints isn’t a luxury either, even as you witness George slowly taking the initiative with his wife. George in many ways, remains a calm and collected character who is often devoid of emotions. In fact, it wouldn’t be wrong to compare him with the protagonist from The Killer (also played by Michael Fassbender). There is a silent purpose that he fulfills of tracking down the traitor, without having extravagant expressions to boast of. In a scene, you see him casually inquiring with Kathryn about a film that she ‘may’ have watched (with a purpose), only for him to casually ‘play along’ when she agrees to watch it with him with a pretext of not having watched it earlier. In another scene, you see him calmly inviting favours of shifting the satellite view with the help of Clarissa, in order to have a surveillance on his wife who is supposedly meeting a Russian agent. Hence clearly, one of the themes of the drama also revolves around the rocky marriage between George and Kathryn, who double up as colleagues, and have a unique conflict before them – their love for their country before themselves!
There is a searing geo-political theme doing the rounds while consistently acting as a connecting thread in the drama. This is also reflective as a pseudo timeline of 7 days that George needs to stick to, before catastrophe would strike. There is a talk about a Severus program holding a secret, which if held by wrong hands, would supposedly cause a nuclear meltdown thereby destabilizing the government. This, while the stakes in the drama are raised with the sudden death of a character followed by a security breach on behalf of George who chose to have surveillance on his wife. The underlying themes of nationality versus morality are expertly explored through a couple of characters who in a scene, undergo a polygraph test.
The events leading up to the final act are almost mirror opposites of that of the first act when all characters are seated across the table. The only shift in the tone is in terms of the writing shifting gears, and adding a little more urgency to the proceedings while deceptively relying on the usage of dry humour. And even when the final reveal takes place just minutes before the end credits roll out, it does open a pandora’s box on the inter-personal relationships that had a direct impact on the lives of George and Kathryn, with multiple set-ups in play. The set-ups here were both exploitative and counter-exploitative in nature, that literally pitted the husband-wife duo against each other. This also was in sync with the two recurring themes of the film – the love for the nation (with respect to one setup), and the love between two characters (with respect to the other setup), both of which were addressed along the way. And in that regard, the final reveal was a winner too, something that kept you guessing until the very end. Hence, the screenplay here is niche with dollops of dry humour that compliments the leisurely pace of the drama yet keeping you invested with the characters and their shifting dynamics.
Dialogues, Music & Direction
The dialogues are laced with a dry sense of humour that automatically makes this drama a niche in many ways. But at the same time, the drama never really gets heavy despite being dense with information, primarily due to this aspect. The BGM remains subtle while quietly accompanying the narrative with the required bouts of urgency. The cinematography comprises of frames that allow you to stay connected with the characters and their shifting dynamics through some intense midshots amidst some interesting conversations. The editing is sharp and crisp, an aspect that keeps the runtime of the film in check to under 90 minutes. Director Steven Soderbergh does an astonishingly good job in constructing a subtly intense drama by literally dropping the viewers directly into his world. The primary conflict acts as a connecting thread in the drama while he laces the narrative with an interesting bunch of similarly mounted characters that often keep you invested. The direction remains pretty admirable for its unique attempt at storytelling.
Performances
The performances are pretty good by the members of the cast. Pierce Brosnan as Arthur is a character filled with meta-humour given his previous participation as Former James Bond, and so his character is a catharsis in many ways, and ably performed too. Marisa Abela as Clarissa and Tom Burke as Freddie are sincere and subtly goofy with their characters, and both manage to stand-out. Naomie Harris as Zoe and Rege-Jean Page as James are quietly layered characters with similar traits, that allow you to play the guessing game just like Clarissa and Freddie. Cate Blanchett as Kathryn remains mysterious and understated with a sly smile through and through while acknowledging the suspicion of the character of George. And she does a wonderful job in maintaining the posture and mannerisms with respect to her character. Michael Fassbender as George remains calm and collected with a stoic face that remains devoid of any emotions. And he is splendid with his body language that reeks of a dry sense of humour.
Conclusion
Black Bag is an intriguing espionage thriller laced with a dry sense of humour and packaged in a battle of wits that makes for an immersive watch. Highly Recommended!