Popcorn Reviewss

White thumbnail popcorn reviewss
popcorn reviewss banner
White thumbnail popcorn reviewss

Maa

Farhad Dalal Founder
By-
Farhad Dalal
Rating
2.5 Star popcorn reviewss

Introduction

The new Hindi film Maa is a masterclass in conveying the fact that a drama will always remain mediocre if it doesn’t flesh out the concept that it wishes to showcase. You can include the folklore stories of Kaali Maa, Rakt Beej and everything else – but if your storytelling template doesn’t go beyond the good versus evil concept, then the film will fall flat. And Maa falls exactly in this trap. The cold open in Maa is an interesting one – a character giving birth that is essentially the center of an ancient ritual that celebrates Goddess Kaali. The setting itself did create a fascinating atmosphere that prepares the viewers for the ominous signs ahead, while teasing them with glimpses of a monster that is prevalent in the forest. The entire sequence that plays out like a ritual, soon takes the form of a tragedy that doubles up as a hook in the screenplay. The brutal undertones coupled with a larger mystery around the folklore, sets up things wonderfully for the drama to follow, almost promising to be a horror folklore rooted in mythology. But alas! The broad strokes in the drama overpower the intrinsic concept that the film has to offer.

Story & Screenplay

One of the many weak aspects of Maa remains its characterization, something that is conveniently bartered for the folklore concept in the film. So when you are first introduced to Ambika (Kajol), you see her lecturing her young students on a mythological story involving Goddess Kaali and a monster who was destroyed at her hands. You almost immediate reminisce of the character of Sakshi (Nushrratt Bharuccha) conveying similar sentiments in the opening act of Chhorii 2 (2025), which incidently had the same maker at the helm of things. And instantly, you cannot tell both films apart other than the additional setting of Bengal in Maa, even as both characters of Sakshi and Ambika (another name for Maa Parvati who takes the form of Maa Kaali for the greater good; as mentioned by her character) are shown to be mothers. But one fundamental mistake that I am circling back to, remains the characterization of her daughter Shweta (Kherin Sharma).

The writers mention that Shweta is a 12 year old girl who is fascinated with the village of Chandrapur, the ancestral village of her father Shuvankar (Indraneil Sengupta). In an alternate universe, she would be Anjali from Kuch Kuch Hota Hai (1999) who would wish to go to a summer camp because she loves ‘singing and dancing’. But the close association of Shweta with Chandrapur isn’t explored beyond the obvious fact of the village being her ancestral home. It is a tad bit lazy to assume that a place that she strongly wishes to go, but is kept mysterious to her also, holds such a broad stroke of assumption in the narrative that remains a fundamental block in the screenplay. But that as it turned out, remained least of my problems.

On the brighter side of the narrative, the eerie setting of Chandrapur that is witness to twin tragedies, does hold an ambience of intrigue. There is pathos and fear in the air, even as fate brings Ambika and Shweta to the ill-fated place that is home to mysterious set of characters in the form of Joydeep (Ronit Roy), the new patriarch of the family, the help-clan Bikash (Gopal Singh) and his wife Nandini (Suryasikha Das), their daughter Deepika (Roopkatha Chakraborty) and a mysterious elderly stateman (Dibyendu Bhattacharya). It is seemingly clear that each of these characters hold a mystery, even as an adamant Shweta asks Deepika to take her to the deep woods in order to spot a sketch that was ‘accidently’ created on her tablet. This, even as the emotional core with respect to loss is completely sidelined in the tale, something that we see only glimpses of going forward.

From a concept perspective, the folklore works but only partially. And I say partially for two reasons – the revelation at the halfway mark was literally spoonfed to the viewers as opposed to allowing the viewers to unravel information (or even bits of it) through the drama, or alternately draw parallels with the central theme. That remained the crux of the drama, which was let out within a minute or two, whilst also being extremely convoluted with its undertones. Secondly, the writers also go overboard with a secondary theme of female infanticide that doesn’t seem seamless whilst marginally contradicting with the main folklore. Essentially, both these themes remain equally relevant, but when put together, the result is convoluted and contradicting. It is almost like Chhorii 2 (2025) and Bulbbul (2020) in a Stree (2018) world that doesn’t necessarily sit right.

The major issue lies in the second hour wherein the tone of the drama goes for a complete toss. Suddenly, the faded atmospherics that had held ground, make way for more extravagent and fantasy tones, something that you would see in a TV show like Naagin. The over-the-top indulgence is clear with a desperate attempt to bombard the viewers with a forced sense of horror that is virtually non-existent. And that made me realise on why the filmmakers opt for a horror-comedy genre instead of a plain horror – the reason is that plain horror can only hold your attention if the writing is solid (particularly in times today when there are handy distractions available around us).

The twist in the tale could literally be seen from a mile away, and so when the ‘big’ revelation takes place, it hardly comes as a shock. There is a brief period involving Ambika when she completely goes into a trance during a ritual, something that definitely contributed to an engaging watch. But almost immediately, the double whammy at the end converged the drama into a good versus evil story that didn’t completely utilize the folklore concept in a way to elevate the drama. Hence, the end did feel convenient and abrupt while also being underwhelming. And that did sum up the screenplay for me that remained inconsistent and mid, through and through. And and, the Shaitaan universe integration at the end felt just so forced, and an after-thought!

Dialogues, Music & Direction

The dialogues capture an intense Bengali flavour through the dialect of the characters, something that adds a good level of texture to the drama. Another big miss for me was the music and the BGM. The rehashed version of the Zubin Nautiyal number ‘Humnava’, literally felt like a sore thumb in the mix of things. The notes used to depict the mother and daughter bond evoked no real emotions for me, neither was it successful in creating a haunting theme of the drama, wherein the basic emotion was compromised. As a result, the BGM was a huge misfit for me. The cinematography remains a mixed bag here – while the interiors evoke a chilling sense of fear with its atmospherics, the actual miss is outside, wherein the frames felt flat given that they felt like a set as opposed to an actual location. The impact of fear just wasn’t there! The editing was an important cog to land jump-scares (given that the drama ventured in that space in the second hour), but the timing was always a fraction short of the sweet spot.

Director Vishal Furia is woefully getting predictable with his filmography now, wherein all his horror films feel the same, and also don’t necessarily score in quality. Here too, I did feel that a better director could have elevated the folklore even more, as opposed to Vishal who reduced the concept to a convoluted mess by trying to say too many things at the same time. His handling of the tone of horror from atmospheric to fantasy was inconsistent and patchy, thereby reducing the drama to just about a standard horror outing.

Performances

The performances are pretty good by the members of the cast but not all characters have a character arc to boast of. Yaaneea Bharadwaj, Aashit Chatterjee, Indraneil Sengupta and Dibyendu Bhattacharya have their moments to shine but I couldn’t help but feel that their characters were unwritten. Jitin Gulati as Sarfaraz is good but again his character remains far too one-dimensional to have any sort of an impact on the screenplay. Gopal Singh as Bikash and Surjyasikha Das as Nandini are excellent here but their individual tracks are reduced to the background too, after a point. The two young girls Roopkatha Chakraborty as Deepika and Kherin Sharma as Shweta are wonderful to witness, and their acts rise above the predictability of their characters. Ronit Roy as Joydeep is excellent here, literally nailing his performance while holding one end-up in wjat felt like a partially sinking ship. Kajol as Ambika is pleasantly well within herself, even as she delivers a solid performance. The different moods and shades of her character are nicely touched upon, wherein she definitely leaves a mark at crucial moments in the screenplay.

Conclusion

Despite some good performances, Maa is an inconsistent and mid folklore horror that falters with its concept due to its overstuffed writing and lacklustre execution. And the fact that there is very little horror to boast of, the drama here remains a swing and a miss. Available in a theatre near you.

Latest Posts

error: Content is protected !!