Popcorn Reviewss

White thumbnail popcorn reviewss
popcorn reviewss banner
White thumbnail popcorn reviewss

Civil War

Farhad Dalal
By-
Farhad Dalal
Rating
4 Star popcorn reviewss

Introduction

At what point in the war do journalists actually become soldiers? Yes, they may not be fighting the war physically but still hold an important tool of broadcasting the realities of it, often told through a scorching lens while also risking their lives, something that makes their profession noble. The role of the media is the most important one for a healthy democracy and while the same has crumbled in several parts of the world, I still feel that there are a handful from the profession who would still risk their lives while showcasing the truth. Yes, there is also a thin line between sensationalism and reality but a few still continue to tread a fine line while ensuring that it isn’t blurred. A dystopian thriller as a genre is always interesting given that it potentially stems out from the times that we live in, while being a brutal reminder on how quickly things could escalate if we aren’t careful enough. In Civil War, Hollywood’s latest offering at an imagined civil war situation in America, all of these themes are tactfully explored, does the film manage to score though, let’s find out.

Story & Screenplay

Civil War follows the story of war journalists who attempt to travel to Washington DC in order to get the latest byte from the President Of The United States, while the country finds itself in the middle of a massive civil war. The story here has an interesting premise while setting the drama only in the near future and reimagining the atrocities of war within the country. Now this isn’t your typical war movie with heroes rising from the ashes to save the day. This is a war erupting from an internal conflict while the drama consistently remains apolitical in its approach. So as a viewer, you aren’t exactly aware of what the conflict is, which was exactly the point of the drama as well. Usually, apolitical dramas do not raise the stake as much given that they choose to unfold at a lower wavelength without taking sides. But Civil War is different. It almost blurs the conflict to the point wherein the chaos of a civil war is out of hand and the people have forgotten on what the original conflict was in the first place. And this results in a thrilling and uncompromising drama that chooses to focus on the plight of the war journalists over the course of its runtime of 110 minutes. 

The drama begins with a mild introduction of the President of the United States practicing for a speech that he wishes to convey to his people amidst the outbreak of a massive civil war. The character does have a searing resemblance to Trump even with his carefree mannerisms that indicate an authoritarian at work that has completely demolished the prevalent democracy in the country. Yet, the film quickly shifts focus to the protagonists who are shown to be war journalists known for covering the situation at the ground level. And very early on, the perils of their occupation is established wherein they barely manage to survive a suicide bomb blast while covering the events on ground. But ambition also plays an important role in the occupation wherein the protagonists decide to make their way to DC to get a final byte from the President before the White House falls. The journey is dangerous but worth the risk! 

The proceedings are engaging while maintaining a tense ambience at various junctures of the road trip. There is a hint of a mental trauma disturbing one of the protagonists Lee, a veteran of war journalism having consistently been witness to the torture and killings during her tenure. On the other hand is Jessie, a rookie photographer with the exuberance and carelessness of youth who looks up to Lee while aspiring to cover the war while climbing up the ladder of success. These different ideologies often meet a common ground as they make their way to DC amidst the escalating tensions of war, some of which are brutal and almost threatening to stall their journey, and worst still, their lives. 

I wouldn’t be wrong in saying that this can also be termed as a very unique road movie that captures the horrors of the war through the lens of the protagonists. There are several tense moments along the way even as the writers decide to raise the stakes in the drama by bumping off important characters along the way, even as the ambience manages to put you as a viewer on a knife edge! The events are powerful and traumatic even as the drama continues to be apolitical in its approach leading up to the finale that briefly flirts with the line of sensationalism and simply reporting the events of the war(in this case through some startling images). The screenplay is relentless and scorching in its approach and makes for a rather tense watch.

Dialogues, Music & Direction

The dialogues are conversational but the lines and the dialect also represent the identity of the characters based on the region where they belong to in the US. This was an important ingredient to add a different flavour in the drama, more importantly in the context of things as they stand. The music and BGM are good often playing off in the background as a pulsating number while suddenly shifting to complete moments of silence while allowing the sound design of the action unfolding to also take centerstage. This frequent shift in the sound design also acts as a timely reminder to the viewers that the action in war might seem to be glorified in films but in reality things are vastly different. The cinematography coupled with the production design is excellent with frames capturing the remains of the war which seem very close to reality. Even the tight closeups during the battleground sequences amp up the tension that is prevalent in the drama thereby ensuring that the narrative is consistently engaging. The editing is sharp and the drama doesn’t overstay its welcome. Director Alex Garland does a phenomenal job in creating a fearful dystopian world which can so easily be picked and dropped in any other part of the world too. Even his characterization was spot on, purposely allowing room for viewers to form opinion about their past even as they navigate amidst the unending tensions of war on the streets. The direction is refreshingly with the manner in which the drama is executed, being completely relentless with its approach without really taking any sides of right versus wrong.

Performances

The performances are excellent by the ensemble cast. Nelson Lee as Tony and Nick Offerman as President have their moments to shine. Stepgen McKinley as Sammy is sincere and exudes of warmth, wisdom and empathy in a character performed rather well by him. Wagner Moura as Joel is wonderful to witness too, often masking his inner turmoils with an exterior that symbolizes an easy going personality. This, until a personal loss brings all his suppressed emotions to the fore. Cailee Spaeny as Jessie is excellent to witness as a character who is oblivious to the sacrifices of the war while having an imprinted picture of glory and ambition in her mind. This justifies the carefree attitude that she brings to the table with her character. Kirsten Dunst as Lee is simply brilliant to witness. If her PTSD is anything to go by, she understands the cost of war and what it means to her profession. As a result, she is often practical while being the one to take care of her group. And the restraint that she brings to her character is truly amazing to witness.

Conclusion

Despite being apolitical in its approach, Civil War is a tense journey on war journalism packaged in a thrilling and frightening dystopian drama that makes for a brilliant watch. Available in a theatre near you and Highly Recommended.

Latest Posts

error: Content is protected !!